Swedish Meatballs Confidential (pNSFW): Recipe for Perfect Meatballs

Feb 5, 2006

Recipe for Perfect Meatballs

The infamous Mohammed Cariactures------>

K(P+A+D)= All Muslims Now Potential WMDs

Where:
K = Kindling á la Muslim Riff Raff
P = Pictures by and for Danish Crackers
A = Our Embedded Agent Provocateurs
D = Muslim Crackpot Demagogues

"Brilliant Psy Op troopers! You were a bit late out of the gate on this one but what the heck. Now let 's just lean back and watch Bolton do what he was headhunted to do at the UN. Then...then we can really start wasting these pedophiliacal camel fuckers in biblical proportions. Yee Haw!"
- Henry

6 comments:

Effwit said...: Good work M. Meatball.

Your analysis of this agit-prop program turns out to be spot on. (I knew it would.)

Xymphora tells us today that the Danish editor is close to Daniel Pipes. Nuff said there.

Also, a commenter points out:

Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten ("Morning Herald Jutland's Post")...Among people in the know, JP goes by the name of Morgenfascisten Jyllands-Pesten ("Morning Fascist Jutland's Plague").; Mon Feb 06, 03:11:00 PM EST
M1 said...: Pipes and the Danish editor are close? This is startling insight, bro. I gotta run over to Xymph and check that out.

Maybe I have to retract my cautious guess that this baby was kicked off per cracker accident.

Kira sort of admonished me not to have too much faith in the prowess of intelligence services. I was trying to abide by that rule by not giving them credit for the spark.

But golly, I'm almost ripe 'n ready to exalt, "Top drawer work boyz & girls"" and thus bring down the hot 'n steamy wrath of Kira. (There I go fantasizing again); Mon Feb 06, 06:29:00 PM EST
Effwit said...: Cautious guess?

Shee-it, I was betting that you were passing along wisdom from your own Hal Holbrook.

I'm still thinking your tag along interpretation is right.

The psy-ops boys could never pull this one off from scratch.

(T)oo much faith in the prowess of intelligence services?

If anything, we know that the opposite is true.; Mon Feb 06, 08:22:00 PM EST
M1 said...: Ah Ah Ah Amen; Tue Feb 07, 07:01:00 AM EST
Anonymous said...: so did they? or didn't they?

you guys have covered all your bases so you could never be wrong?

smart; Mon Feb 13, 01:46:00 PM EST
M1 said...: Sometimes it's yin...and sometimes it's also yang. Go figure.

Welcome to the convenient physics of planet Meatball, Mr. Humidor; Mon Feb 13, 02:29:00 PM EST

EXCHANGE

M1:

If we are to take the idea and actions of the Long War seriously then we must immediately come to terms with the full spectrum of consequences of our nation engaged in COIN everywhere and always.

For this, only IO against self can provide us the slightest of chances for persevering without being sundered from within by the trauma of old school losses coming back to gnaw at a Will reared on the decisive and temporally compartmentalized wins of the history books that have reared us.

Otherwise we would do best in working for outlooks and solutions beyond the framework of the Long War. However, such choices are perhaps best left for consideration by more driven and invested minds.

So what do you say, Bernays - any hidden costs? Is this where democracy ends or perhaps where democracy only truly can begin?"

Reply by Matt at MountainRunner:

"The answer: Yes and no to both.

In part, Smith-Mundt is a response to Bernays' activities thirty-five years earlier.

During the massive restructuring of the United States to counter the emerging ideological threat coming from all angles (remember the National Security Act of 1947 was passed during the two years of debate on Smith-Mundt), Smith-Mundt was to protect democracy, not from itself but from the outside.

Protection inside was mainly for the broadcasters, which Benton vigorously and successfully courted the broadcasters and continued to do so afterward its passage in a period of increasingly rapid (relatively) news cycles and accessibility.

The Swede [HaHa!] is right, something significant needs to be done with Smith-Mundt, but attempts at an outright dismissal will be met by a swift and emotional counter-reaction. What is necessary is a conversation on the topic to understand its purpose and intent.

Commentary By Zenpundit:

Nice.

A few days ago, I discussed H-Diplo (a Listserv) as weaker platform than a blog, despite the past richness as a community of interest ( some folks feel the time of H-Net is long over).

Today, I featured an H-Diplo roundtable that could only be most easily put together by a high-powered community of vertical-thinking experts. That is a listserv operating at it's best, showcasing an exchange of real scholarly depth and nuance.

Nevertheless, the exchange that just occurred between SMC and Matt would never have happened on a moderated forum like H-Diplo.

Too cross-disciplinary.

Too idiosyncratic.

Too controversial.

Too much a square peg in the round hole.

Too...too...
undisciplinary

Best IO-Blog Ever
(w/ some serious caveats, of course.)
-Michael Tanji

Subscribe in a reader

A must-read blog for IO practitioners or scholars of intelligence and communications interested in the subterranean media ecosystem of disinformation,black propaganda, white noise and strategic messages coming in all shades of gray.
- Mark Safranski aka Zen Pundit

Where meatballs are concerned, results are more important than authenticity.
-Book of Meatballs 81:99

I found this at a website that has alot of interesting posts about the “war of ideas” with Jihadis and psychological and information warfare.

Each post at this site is illustrated with an “art porn” image, and some of images seem to be deliberately provacative to muslims with pictures of naked women in hijab or vaginas that have been sown closed.

So if you’re offended or easily “incited to evil thoughts” or whatever, maybe you should stay away.
ProgressiveIslam.Org

We wear the mask that grins and lies.It hides our cheeks and shades our eyes. IO, Baby.